Your clients keep working.
You stop prepping
for every 1:1.
Tack AI is the between-session engine for coaching practices: chat grounded in your frameworks, live roleplay reps your clients can fail safely in, and a pre-session brief drafted for you before every call.
Six days of silence, then thirty minutes of catching up.
It answers the way you would — and shows its work.
Your frameworks, worksheets and session notes are chunked and embedded. When a client messages at 11pm the night before a review, Tack answers from your material, in your register, and ends with one concrete action — never a wall of options.
- Cites the exact IP chunk under every reply, so you can audit it.
- Hard topics you flag get redirected to your live 1:1 instead of improvised.
- Every exchange feeds the client's career health score and your next brief.
It sounds greedy when it starts with what you want. Flip it so it starts with what you've already delivered — that's the sequence in your coach's value-evidence framework.
Three sentences, in this order:
- Evidence. "Since January I've owned the onboarding rebuild — it cut setup time from 9 days to 4."
- Scope shift. "That's a level above the job I was hired into, and it's now permanent."
- The ask. "I'd like my compensation to reflect that. I'm looking at $118,000."
One number to prepare before Thursday: the single result of yours with a figure attached to it. Not three — one, said clearly.
Which result are you leading with, and do you have the figure for it yet?
Reps they can fail at, before the room that counts.
Salary negotiation, a promotion case, a difficult stakeholder, a resignation conversation. Tack plays the other side of the table — pushing back the way a real hiring manager or skip-level does — and the client gets 20 turns to hold their line.
- Auto-injects the client's real role, target comp and skill profile.
- Ends with a graded report: clarity, confidence, strategy, skill gaps.
- The report lands in your portal — coach the gap, not the recap.
Hiring manager:
I appreciate you naming a number. Honestly, $118 is outside the band we approved for this level — I've got $104 to $110, and $110 is already me stretching. I don't want comp to be the thing that stops this.
Named a specific figure early and tied it to delivered scope rather than market averages.
Conceded to $110 within one exchange. Didn't test non-base levers — sign-on, review timing, title — before moving.
- Ran two negotiation roleplays ahead of Thursday's review (B+, C+).
- Rewrote his impact summary using the value-evidence sequence.
- Still hasn't booked the skip-level he committed to on the 12th.
- What made you drop from $118 to $110 so quickly in the practice run?
- What's actually stopping the skip-level from getting booked?
- If Thursday goes badly, what's your next move — and by when?
Walk into every session already caught up.
Book the 1:1 in Tack and a brief is drafted from everything that actually happened since you last spoke — wins with impact weighting, stalled goals, roleplay grades, health-score movement, and three questions worth opening with. Editable, printable, and yours before the call starts.
- Delivered ahead of the session — in-app and by email.
- Micro-win impact is classified by Tack, and overridable by you.
- Export as a one-page PDF to share with the client afterwards.